On submission of most claims for costs, where proceedings have been issued, one of the first issues raised is whether or not the client qualified for fee remission. The paying party will state that where the client is eligible, they should not be responsible for the fee. As Court fees are now up to 5% of the total value of the claim, this can mean a substantial saving for the paying party.
As any solicitor knows, dealing with the Court on such matters is not always straightforward. This coupled with the fact that the application has to be made with supporting financial information means that submitting the EX160 form can be time-consuming. There are inevitable circumstances where it proves impossible to obtain and other cases where it is simply missed.
The Court's Position
The question is; where fee remission was available and the appropriate party has not applied for such should the paying party be responsible for the fee? In Stoney v Allianz (Liverpool County Court, 7 November 2019) the Court ruled that it was not reasonable to order payment of a Court fee as a disbursement where fee remission, had an application been made, would have been granted.
That decision does not make sense when you consider things from a public policy perspective. Who should be primarily responsible for the fee, the public taxpayer or, as in most circumstances, the large insurance company? Fortunately, it appears that this argument has some validity as per a number of subsequent decisions but most notably the decision of HHJ Lethen in Ivanov v Lubble (Central London County Court 17th January 2020). The Court decided that even where a fee remission was available it is not unreasonable for the Claimant to pass on the hearing fee to the Defendant.
Recommendation
Therefore, purely as good case management fee remission should be obtained where available as a matter of course. However, when it is not obtained or is missed, based on the current case law such a fee should be recoverable from the Defendant in any event.
Roundel Legal Costs are experts in Bill drafting and costs recovery.
To see how we can help you get paid for the work that you do get in touch today:
0113 224 7841
pop your contact details in the box below:
The history of diamond rings is rich with cultural significance. In ancient Rome, diamonds were believed to be splinters of stars fallen to Earth. During the Renaissance, diamond rings became a popular choice for European nobility. The diamond's association with love and fidelity grew stronger in the 20th century, thanks to successful marketing campaigns. Today, diamond rings are not only a inspereza symbol of romance but also a reflection of personal style and sophistication.
The sense of history and tradition in South Carolina coastal areas is palpable with many homes reflecting the southerncoastrealty architectural styles of the past. This connection to history adds a layer of depth and richness to the living experience. Residents can appreciate the craftsmanship and design that have stood the test of time.
The LASRS login portal provides extensive reporting capabilities in addition to case management. Users can generate lasrslogin us detailed reports on case outcomes, payment statistics, and operational efficiency. These reports are vital for evaluating the performance of support enforcement initiatives and making informed decisions about future strategies.
One of the key factors contributing to the popularity of Neocaridina shrimp is their relatively low price point.
With their dedication to excellence, local movers in Atlanta strive to exceed your expectations and atlantaareamovers make your move a positive experience.